DevVersus

Activepieces vs Zapier(2026)

Activepieces is better for teams that need free and open source. Zapier is the stronger choice if largest integration catalog. Activepieces is open-source (from $0) and Zapier is freemium (from $19.99/mo).

Full feature breakdown, pricing details, and pros & cons below.

Affiliate disclosure: Some “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. It does not affect our rankings or editorial coverage. Learn more.

Activepieces logo

Activepieces

open-source

Activepieces is an open-source automation tool with 100+ integrations and a no-code interface. Self-host it free or use the cloud — built for teams who want Zapier-like ease with control.

Starting at $0

Visit Activepieces
Zapier logo

Zapier

freemium

Zapier connects your apps and automates repetitive tasks with multi-step workflows called Zaps. With 6,000+ integrations, it is the go-to no-code automation platform for business teams.

Starting at $19.99/mo

Visit Zapier

How Do Activepieces and Zapier Compare on Features?

FeatureActivepiecesZapier
Pricing modelopen-sourcefreemium
Starting price$0$19.99/mo
Open source (MIT)
Self-hostable
100+ integrations
No-code editor
Branching logic
Webhook triggers
Community pieces
6,000+ app integrations
Multi-step Zaps
Conditional logic (Filters/Paths)
Built-in storage (Tables)
AI actions
Webhooks
Scheduled triggers

Activepieces Pros and Cons vs Zapier

A

Activepieces

+Free and open source
+Easy self-hosting (Docker)
+Growing integration library
+Clean UI
Fewer integrations than Zapier/n8n
Smaller community
Less battle-tested
Z

Zapier

+Largest integration catalog
+No-code friendly
+Reliable execution
+Excellent documentation
Expensive at scale
Task-based pricing adds up
Limited data transformation

Should You Use Activepieces or Zapier?

Choose Activepieces if…

  • Free and open source
  • Easy self-hosting (Docker)
  • Growing integration library

Choose Zapier if…

  • Largest integration catalog
  • No-code friendly
  • Reliable execution

More Workflow Automation Comparisons