DevVersus

AWS S3 vs Bunny.net Storage(2026)

AWS S3 is better for teams that need battle-tested reliability. Bunny.net Storage is the stronger choice if very cheap storage + cdn. AWS S3 is paid (from $0.023/GB/month + egress) and Bunny.net Storage is paid (from $0.01/GB/month).

Full feature breakdown, pricing details, and pros & cons below.

Affiliate disclosure: Some “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. It does not affect our rankings or editorial coverage. Learn more.

AWS S3 logo

AWS S3

paid

Amazon S3 is the industry-standard object storage service with 99.999999999% durability.

Starting at $0.023/GB/month + egress

Visit AWS S3
Bunny.net Storage logo

Bunny.net Storage

paid

Bunny.net provides edge storage with CDN replication and object storage at prices 5-10x cheaper than AWS S3 with CDN included.

Starting at $0.01/GB/month

Visit Bunny.net Storage

How Do AWS S3 and Bunny.net Storage Compare on Features?

FeatureAWS S3Bunny.net Storage
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting price$0.023/GB/month + egress$0.01/GB/month
99.999999999% durability
Versioning
Lifecycle policies
Event notifications
Glacier archival
Access controls
Edge storage
CDN replication
Image processing
Video streaming
DDoS protection
Perma-cache

AWS S3 Pros and Cons vs Bunny.net Storage

A

AWS S3

+Battle-tested reliability
+Massive ecosystem
+Extensive tooling
+Fine-grained access control
Egress fees add up fast
Complex pricing
AWS account complexity
B

Bunny.net Storage

+Very cheap storage + CDN
+Global edge network
+No egress to CDN fees
+Simple pricing
Less S3 compatibility than R2
Smaller ecosystem
Fewer developer integrations

Should You Use AWS S3 or Bunny.net Storage?

Choose AWS S3 if…

  • Battle-tested reliability
  • Massive ecosystem
  • Extensive tooling

Choose Bunny.net Storage if…

  • Very cheap storage + CDN
  • Global edge network
  • No egress to CDN fees

More Object Storage Comparisons