Bruno vs Hoppscotch(2026)
Bruno is better for teams that need truly local/offline. Hoppscotch is the stronger choice if free and open source. Bruno is open-source (from $0) and Hoppscotch is open-source (from $0).
Full feature breakdown, pricing details, and pros & cons below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. It does not affect our rankings or editorial coverage. Learn more.
Bruno
Bruno is an open-source API client that stores collections directly as files on disk — making them Git-friendly and shareable without cloud sync, addressing concerns with Postman/Insomnia's cloud dependency.
Starting at $0
Visit BrunoHoppscotch
Hoppscotch is a free, open-source API testing tool that runs in the browser — supporting REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, SSE, and MQTT with a clean, minimal interface and self-hosting.
Starting at $0
Visit HoppscotchHow Do Bruno and Hoppscotch Compare on Features?
| Feature | Bruno | Hoppscotch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | open-source |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| File-based collections (Git-friendly) | ✓ | — |
| Offline-first | ✓ | — |
| REST/GraphQL/SOAP | ✓ | — |
| JavaScript scripting | ✓ | — |
| Environment variables | ✓ | — |
| CI/CD (bru CLI) | ✓ | — |
| No cloud sync required | ✓ | — |
| Browser-based | — | ✓ |
| REST/GraphQL/WebSocket/SSE/MQTT | — | ✓ |
| Open source (MIT) | — | ✓ |
| Self-hostable | — | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | — | ✓ |
| PWA (offline) | — | ✓ |
| Collections | — | ✓ |
Bruno Pros and Cons vs Hoppscotch
Bruno
Hoppscotch
Should You Use Bruno or Hoppscotch?
Choose Bruno if…
- •Truly local/offline
- •Git-native workflow
- •Growing fast (Postman/Insomnia alternative)
Choose Hoppscotch if…
- •Free and open source
- •Browser-based (no install)
- •Supports many protocols