DevVersus

Bunny.net Storage vs AWS S3(2026)

Bunny.net Storage is better for teams that need very cheap storage + cdn. AWS S3 is the stronger choice if battle-tested reliability. Bunny.net Storage is paid (from $0.01/GB/month) and AWS S3 is paid (from $0.023/GB/month + egress).

Full feature breakdown, pricing details, and pros & cons below.

Affiliate disclosure: Some “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. It does not affect our rankings or editorial coverage. Learn more.

Bunny.net Storage logo

Bunny.net Storage

paid

Bunny.net provides edge storage with CDN replication and object storage at prices 5-10x cheaper than AWS S3 with CDN included.

Starting at $0.01/GB/month

Visit Bunny.net Storage
AWS S3 logo

AWS S3

paid

Amazon S3 is the industry-standard object storage service with 99.999999999% durability.

Starting at $0.023/GB/month + egress

Visit AWS S3

How Do Bunny.net Storage and AWS S3 Compare on Features?

FeatureBunny.net StorageAWS S3
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting price$0.01/GB/month$0.023/GB/month + egress
Edge storage
CDN replication
Image processing
Video streaming
DDoS protection
Perma-cache
99.999999999% durability
Versioning
Lifecycle policies
Event notifications
Glacier archival
Access controls

Bunny.net Storage Pros and Cons vs AWS S3

B

Bunny.net Storage

+Very cheap storage + CDN
+Global edge network
+No egress to CDN fees
+Simple pricing
Less S3 compatibility than R2
Smaller ecosystem
Fewer developer integrations
A

AWS S3

+Battle-tested reliability
+Massive ecosystem
+Extensive tooling
+Fine-grained access control
Egress fees add up fast
Complex pricing
AWS account complexity

Should You Use Bunny.net Storage or AWS S3?

Choose Bunny.net Storage if…

  • Very cheap storage + CDN
  • Global edge network
  • No egress to CDN fees

Choose AWS S3 if…

  • Battle-tested reliability
  • Massive ecosystem
  • Extensive tooling

More Object Storage Comparisons