DevVersus

Convex vs Pusher(2026)

Convex is better for teams that need real-time by default. Pusher is the stronger choice if simple to integrate. Convex is freemium (from $25/month) and Pusher is freemium (from $49/month).

Full feature breakdown, pricing details, and pros & cons below.

By Bikram Nath

Affiliate disclosure: Some “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. It does not affect our rankings or editorial coverage. Learn more.

Convex logo

Convex

freemium

Convex is a reactive backend platform where database queries automatically push updates to clients in real time.

Starting at $25/month

Visit Convex
Pusher logo

Pusher

freemium

Pusher provides hosted realtime APIs (WebSockets) for adding live features to web and mobile apps.

Starting at $49/month

Visit Pusher

How Do Convex and Pusher Compare on Features?

FeatureConvexPusher
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting price$25/month$49/month
Reactive queries✓—
TypeScript functions✓—
Built-in database✓—
File storage✓—
Scheduled jobs✓—
Auth integration✓—
WebSocket channels—✓
Presence channels—✓
Private channels—✓
Webhooks—✓
Client libraries—✓
Encrypted connections—✓

Convex Pros and Cons vs Pusher

C

Convex

+Real-time by default
+TypeScript end-to-end
+No separate WebSocket setup
+Excellent DX
−Full platform lock-in
−Custom query language
−Not for existing backends
P

Pusher

+Simple to integrate
+Battle-tested reliability
+Multiple language SDKs
+Presence feature built-in
−Expensive for high connection counts
−No self-hosted option
−Limited message history

Should You Use Convex or Pusher?

For most teams, Convex is the better default: it offers real-time by default and is freemium (from $25/month). Choose Pusher instead if simple to integrate matters more than full platform lock-in. There is no universal winner — the right pick depends on your budget, team size, and whether you value real-time by default or simple to integrate more.

Choose Convex if…

  • •Real-time by default
  • •TypeScript end-to-end
  • •No separate WebSocket setup

Choose Pusher if…

  • •Simple to integrate
  • •Battle-tested reliability
  • •Multiple language SDKs

More Realtime & WebSockets Comparisons