DevVersus

Microlink vs URL2PNG(2026)

Microlink is better for teams that need multi-purpose (screenshot + scrape + metadata). URL2PNG is the stronger choice if long track record. Microlink is freemium (from $0) and URL2PNG is paid (from $9.99/mo).

Full feature breakdown, pricing details, and pros & cons below.

Affiliate disclosure: Some “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. It does not affect our rankings or editorial coverage. Learn more.

Microlink logo

Microlink

freemium

Microlink provides a browser automation API for screenshots, PDF generation, data scraping, and metadata extraction from any URL — with a generous free tier and developer-friendly design.

Starting at $0

Visit Microlink
URL2PNG logo

URL2PNG

paid

URL2PNG is a screenshot API that generates thumbnails and full-size screenshots of websites — one of the older services with a simple integration and CDN-backed delivery.

Starting at $9.99/mo

Visit URL2PNG

How Do Microlink and URL2PNG Compare on Features?

FeatureMicrolinkURL2PNG
Pricing modelfreemiumpaid
Starting price$0$9.99/mo
URL screenshot
PDF generation
Data scraping
Metadata extraction
Prerender (SSR)
CDN-cached results
SDK + REST API
Thumbnails
Full-page capture
CDN-backed
Custom viewport
Force fresh
REST API

Microlink Pros and Cons vs URL2PNG

M

Microlink

+Multi-purpose (screenshot + scrape + metadata)
+Generous free tier
+Caching included
+Developer-friendly
Generalist (not best-in-class for one thing)
Smaller community
Some advanced features paid
U

URL2PNG

+Long track record
+CDN delivery
+Simple integration
+Thumbnails built-in
No free tier
Dated compared to modern alternatives
Smaller team/support

Should You Use Microlink or URL2PNG?

Choose Microlink if…

  • Multi-purpose (screenshot + scrape + metadata)
  • Generous free tier
  • Caching included

Choose URL2PNG if…

  • Long track record
  • CDN delivery
  • Simple integration

More Screenshot APIs Comparisons