NextAuth.js (Auth.js) vs Stytch(2026)
NextAuth.js (Auth.js) is better for teams that need free and open source. Stytch is the stronger choice if best passwordless ux. NextAuth.js (Auth.js) is free and Stytch is freemium (from $249/month).
Full feature breakdown, pricing details, and pros & cons below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. It does not affect our rankings or editorial coverage. Learn more.
NextAuth.js (Auth.js)
NextAuth.js is a complete authentication library for Next.js applications with adapters for 60+ databases and providers.
Visit NextAuth.js (Auth.js)Stytch
Stytch provides authentication APIs with a focus on passwordless flows: magic links, OTP, passkeys, and biometrics.
Starting at $249/month
Visit StytchHow Do NextAuth.js (Auth.js) and Stytch Compare on Features?
| Feature | NextAuth.js (Auth.js) | Stytch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | $249/month |
| 40+ OAuth providers | ✓ | — |
| Database adapters | ✓ | — |
| JWT sessions | ✓ | — |
| Email magic links | ✓ | — |
| Credentials auth | ✓ | — |
| Magic links | — | ✓ |
| OTP | — | ✓ |
| Passkeys | — | ✓ |
| OAuth | — | ✓ |
| Session management | — | ✓ |
| Fraud detection | — | ✓ |
| B2B auth | — | ✓ |
NextAuth.js (Auth.js) Pros and Cons vs Stytch
N
NextAuth.js (Auth.js)
+Free and open source
+No vendor lock-in
+Highly flexible
+Full control
−More setup required
−No prebuilt UI
−Docs can be confusing
S
Stytch
+Best passwordless UX
+Fraud detection built-in
+B2B SSO support
+Good developer docs
−Expensive for small teams
−Less known than Auth0/Clerk
−Enterprise pricing opaque
Should You Use NextAuth.js (Auth.js) or Stytch?
Choose NextAuth.js (Auth.js) if…
- •Free and open source
- •No vendor lock-in
- •Highly flexible
Choose Stytch if…
- •Best passwordless UX
- •Fraud detection built-in
- •B2B SSO support