Soketi vs Convex(2026)
Soketi is better for teams that need free self-hosted. Convex is the stronger choice if real-time by default. Soketi is open-source and Convex is freemium (from $25/month).
Full feature breakdown, pricing details, and pros & cons below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. It does not affect our rankings or editorial coverage. Learn more.
Soketi
Soketi is an open source, Pusher protocol-compatible WebSocket server you can self-host for free.
Visit SoketiConvex
Convex is a reactive backend platform where database queries automatically push updates to clients in real time.
Starting at $25/month
Visit ConvexHow Do Soketi and Convex Compare on Features?
| Feature | Soketi | Convex |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | $25/month |
| Pusher-compatible protocol | ✓ | — |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | — |
| Horizontal scaling | ✓ | — |
| Redis adapter | ✓ | — |
| HTTP API | ✓ | — |
| Multiple apps | ✓ | — |
| Reactive queries | — | ✓ |
| TypeScript functions | — | ✓ |
| Built-in database | — | ✓ |
| File storage | — | ✓ |
| Scheduled jobs | — | ✓ |
| Auth integration | — | ✓ |
Soketi Pros and Cons vs Convex
S
Soketi
+Free self-hosted
+Pusher drop-in replacement
+Low latency
+No vendor lock-in
−Self-hosting overhead
−No hosted cloud option
−Smaller community
C
Convex
+Real-time by default
+TypeScript end-to-end
+No separate WebSocket setup
+Excellent DX
−Full platform lock-in
−Custom query language
−Not for existing backends
Should You Use Soketi or Convex?
Choose Soketi if…
- •Free self-hosted
- •Pusher drop-in replacement
- •Low latency
Choose Convex if…
- •Real-time by default
- •TypeScript end-to-end
- •No separate WebSocket setup