Soketi vs Liveblocks(2026)
Soketi is better for teams that need free self-hosted. Liveblocks is the stronger choice if purpose-built for collaboration ux. Soketi is open-source and Liveblocks is freemium (from $49/month).
Full feature breakdown, pricing details, and pros & cons below.
By Bikram Nath
Affiliate disclosure: Some “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. It does not affect our rankings or editorial coverage. Learn more.
Soketi
Soketi is an open source, Pusher protocol-compatible WebSocket server you can self-host for free.
Visit SoketiLiveblocks
Liveblocks provides APIs and SDKs for building collaborative features like multiplayer cursors, live comments, and co-editing.
Starting at $49/month
Visit LiveblocksHow Do Soketi and Liveblocks Compare on Features?
| Feature | Soketi | Liveblocks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | $49/month |
| Pusher-compatible protocol | ✓ | — |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | — |
| Horizontal scaling | ✓ | — |
| Redis adapter | ✓ | — |
| HTTP API | ✓ | — |
| Multiple apps | ✓ | — |
| Multiplayer cursors | — | ✓ |
| Presence | — | ✓ |
| Collaborative text editing | — | ✓ |
| Comments | — | ✓ |
| Notifications | — | ✓ |
| CRDT-based sync | — | ✓ |
Soketi Pros and Cons vs Liveblocks
Soketi
Liveblocks
Should You Use Soketi or Liveblocks?
For most teams, Soketi is the better default: it offers free self-hosted and is open-source. Choose Liveblocks instead if purpose-built for collaboration ux matters more than self-hosting overhead. There is no universal winner — the right pick depends on your budget, team size, and whether you value free self-hosted or purpose-built for collaboration ux more.
Choose Soketi if…
- •Free self-hosted
- •Pusher drop-in replacement
- •Low latency
Choose Liveblocks if…
- •Purpose-built for collaboration UX
- •Prebuilt UI components
- •CRDT sync