Supabase Storage vs AWS S3(2026)
Supabase Storage is better for teams that need integrated with supabase auth. AWS S3 is the stronger choice if battle-tested reliability. Supabase Storage is freemium (from $25/month (included in Supabase)) and AWS S3 is paid (from $0.023/GB/month + egress).
Full feature breakdown, pricing details, and pros & cons below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. It does not affect our rankings or editorial coverage. Learn more.
Supabase Storage
Supabase Storage is an S3-compatible object storage built on top of S3 with Postgres RLS policies for fine-grained access control.
Starting at $25/month (included in Supabase)
Visit Supabase Storage
AWS S3
Amazon S3 is the industry-standard object storage service with 99.999999999% durability.
Starting at $0.023/GB/month + egress
Visit AWS S3How Do Supabase Storage and AWS S3 Compare on Features?
| Feature | Supabase Storage | AWS S3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | $25/month (included in Supabase) | $0.023/GB/month + egress |
| S3-compatible | ✓ | — |
| Postgres RLS policies | ✓ | — |
| CDN delivery | ✓ | — |
| Image transformations | ✓ | — |
| Resumable uploads | ✓ | — |
| Signed URLs | ✓ | — |
| 99.999999999% durability | — | ✓ |
| Versioning | — | ✓ |
| Lifecycle policies | — | ✓ |
| Event notifications | — | ✓ |
| Glacier archival | — | ✓ |
| Access controls | — | ✓ |
Supabase Storage Pros and Cons vs AWS S3
Supabase Storage
AWS S3
Should You Use Supabase Storage or AWS S3?
Choose Supabase Storage if…
- •Integrated with Supabase auth
- •Row-level security for storage
- •Good free tier
Choose AWS S3 if…
- •Battle-tested reliability
- •Massive ecosystem
- •Extensive tooling