DevVersus

URL2PNG vs Microlink(2026)

URL2PNG is better for teams that need long track record. Microlink is the stronger choice if multi-purpose (screenshot + scrape + metadata). URL2PNG is paid (from $9.99/mo) and Microlink is freemium (from $0).

Full feature breakdown, pricing details, and pros & cons below.

Affiliate disclosure: Some “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. It does not affect our rankings or editorial coverage. Learn more.

URL2PNG logo

URL2PNG

paid

URL2PNG is a screenshot API that generates thumbnails and full-size screenshots of websites — one of the older services with a simple integration and CDN-backed delivery.

Starting at $9.99/mo

Visit URL2PNG
Microlink logo

Microlink

freemium

Microlink provides a browser automation API for screenshots, PDF generation, data scraping, and metadata extraction from any URL — with a generous free tier and developer-friendly design.

Starting at $0

Visit Microlink

How Do URL2PNG and Microlink Compare on Features?

FeatureURL2PNGMicrolink
Pricing modelpaidfreemium
Starting price$9.99/mo$0
URL screenshot
Thumbnails
Full-page capture
CDN-backed
Custom viewport
Force fresh
REST API
PDF generation
Data scraping
Metadata extraction
Prerender (SSR)
CDN-cached results
SDK + REST API

URL2PNG Pros and Cons vs Microlink

U

URL2PNG

+Long track record
+CDN delivery
+Simple integration
+Thumbnails built-in
No free tier
Dated compared to modern alternatives
Smaller team/support
M

Microlink

+Multi-purpose (screenshot + scrape + metadata)
+Generous free tier
+Caching included
+Developer-friendly
Generalist (not best-in-class for one thing)
Smaller community
Some advanced features paid

Should You Use URL2PNG or Microlink?

Choose URL2PNG if…

  • Long track record
  • CDN delivery
  • Simple integration

Choose Microlink if…

  • Multi-purpose (screenshot + scrape + metadata)
  • Generous free tier
  • Caching included

More Screenshot APIs Comparisons